Disadvantages:
Neo-Aerodynamic Technology
The following is the list of disadvantages of Aerodynamic technology when we compare our technology Vs. others that are available on the market even though the uniqueness of our technology does not come parallel with those as if they are sitting side by side
As Wind Turbine
- As of any technology, there may be a limit of how wide and/or how high it can be built.
- As of any technology, there may be a new, better "invention"?
- Being backed by actual models; despite the fact that Neo-Dynamic has the same or better tip-speed, it usually requires a higher ratio gearbox (more expensive) to take advantage of capturing the energy when the wind speed is slow.
- For wind farm application; turbines are on the ground level and the spaces between them are denser therefore it need more land as wind farm dedicated.
As Hydro Turbine
- Transmission line length would have to increase
- The amount of power might decrease during the dry season for rivers if water sources declined but this will also be true of dam water as well since water levels also drop.
- While dam base hydro turbine can regulate output by turning-off number of turbines; when the power is in less needed to save the "water" for later peek demand. Free-flow does not have that capability.
- Dam base hydro turbines are more attractive to developer and/or investor because its facility can be bigger, easier to manage.
- Neo-Aerodynamic can not be setup to harness 100% the width of the flow (river ); but only a portions of it.